Where We Stand

2011 Legislative Contact Information (Phone, U.S. Mail & Email Addresses)

NAACP Civil Rights Federal Legislative Report Card () 

Download Discrimination and Mortgage Lending in America ()

Download F Street Reopening () 

 


Vote against SB 174

 

NAACP Membership,

 

President Frank Hawkins has requested Nevada Legislators to vote against SB 174. Below is a copy of the letter sent by Mr. Hawkins. Please contact your legislators and petition them to oppose this bill.

Below you will find their contact information.

In addition, section 15 of this bill conflicts with current Fannie Mae 2011 under guidelines (B4 2.1-06 - Priority of Common Assessments)  (https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/ssg/sg/pdf/sel012711.pdf)  (page 596).  This bill could potentially make thousands of Nevada's condo and housing projects ineligible for federal financing which could have a tremendous impact on our economy.  There is also a provision which makes the homeowner personally liable for the obligations (fines, collection charges, and assessments) even after the consumer has lost their home through a bank foreclosure.  We do not believe this is right and will only put consumers deeper in the hole.


Sincerely,

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

NEVADA LEGISLATORS - CONTACTS

Shirley Breeden 775-684-1457 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 


SUPPORT OF AMENDMENT OF NEVADA ASSOCIATION

OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ADMINISTRATORS TO AB 237


Dear Chairman Care,

 

I am writing on behalf of the Las Vegas Chapter of the NAACP to support the amendment of the Nevada Association of Juvenile Justice Administrators to AB 237.  I am attorney on the Executive Committee and I am chairman of the Legal Redress Committee of the NAACP in Las Vegas .

 

We strongly support increasing the age for discretionary and presumptive certification of minors under the criminal justice system to 16 years old.  We do not believe treating children as adults changes the reality that they are in fact children who in most other areas of the law are in fact presumptively protected.  We do not believe that we should give up on the most challenged and vulnerable of our children and condemn them to a life of continual or intermittent incarceration.

 

Moreover, we are especially concerned because the hammer of certification falls disproportionately on African-American and Latino children.  As a civil rights organization in the community, we receive numerous complaints and inquiries regarding the racial/ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system.  This amendment presents an opportunity to take a step toward reducing these unjust disparities – an opportunity (and a generation of children) we should not let slip away.

 

Finally, we know that intervention and active support at this crucial age can make a difference in the lives of these children.  We concur with the judgment of the Nevada Association of Juvenile Justice Administrators that such intervention and support is preferable to the ruinous and costly effects of early certification of children.  Our state should be funding intervention programs for these children and not funding more jail space for them.

 

The NAACP in Las Vegas appreciates your time and consideration in hearing our concerns.  

 

                                                                                    Richard F. Boulware, Esq.

                                                                                    NAACP – Las Vegas Chapter

 

 

NAACP Calls National 'Day of Action' Against

Mortgage Discrimination


Studies show African Americans are given more costly, riskier loans regardless of credit history or income

 

NAACP units across the country participated in a national ‘Day of Action’ against discriminatory mortgage lending today by demanding that several of the nation’s top lenders – including Citi, HSBC, WaMu, GMAC and JP Morgan – make amends for discriminating against African American borrowers and eliminate discriminatory polices and practices for good.

 

New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr. joins the NAACP Brooklyn Branch, other elected officials and housing advocates at the NAACP's "National Day of Action" against mortgage discrimination at a City Hall news conference on July 2, 2008. Photo credit: Marla S. Maritzer

According to the NAACP and its lawsuit against 17 major lenders, African American borrowers were given loans with higher interest rates and other poor terms solely because of their race.

The Day of Action was marked by nationwide events in 21 locations including New York , Chicago , Baltimore , St. Louis , Detroit , Las Vegas , suburban Atlanta , Salt Lake City , Colorado Springs, Reno , Memphis , Seattle and southern California . NAACP leaders, other officials and community members held events at lending institutions and in affected neighborhoods to highlight the pervasive and systemic discrimination against African Americans within the mortgage industry and to demand an end to it. 

 

“Every one of us deserves equal access to the ‘American dream’ of homeownership,” said NAACP Interim General Counsel Angela Ciccolo. “Making amends is just the beginning. We want to make sure African Americans are never victimized by the lending industry again. This discrimination was nationwide and cut across income-levels. People with six-figure incomes, significant down-payments and who had owned several homes before were not immune from being discriminated against because of their race.”

 

The NAACP filed a class action lawsuit against 17 of the nation’s largest lenders last July for discriminatory lending practices. The defendants are Washington Mutual, Inc., Citimortgage, Inc., HSBC Finance Corporation, GMAC Mortgage Group, LLC, GMAC Residential Capital, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Chase Bank USA NA, Fremont Investment & Loan, Option One Mortgage Corporation, WMC Mortgage Corporation, Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation dba Encore Credit, First Franklin Financial Corporation, National City Corporation, First Tennessee Bank dba First Horizon National Corp., Long Beach Mortgage Company, and Suntrust Mortgage.

 

“The only difference between the victims in this case and other customers is the color of their skin,” said Brian Kabateck, who is co-lead counsel on the suit. “They had the same credit, the same income and the same qualifications. But because they were African American, they were ripped off.” Discriminatory loans are not just affecting individual borrowers, but entire families and communities as well.

 

“Owning a home means much more than not paying rent. Home ownership is the key to building the wealth that pays for college, supports retirement, and is reinvested in communities,” said NAACP Interim President & CEO Dennis Courtland Hayes. “Discrimination is keeping communities and the next generation of young people from moving forward.”

 

Recent research, including federal data, proves the rampant discrimination in mortgage lending:

 

·                       A July 2007 report by Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) showed that minority borrowers pay higher annual percentage rates on mortgage loans than non-minorities with equal income and credit risk. For instance, in 2005, African American borrowers paid an average of 128 basis points more for loans than their white counterparts. In the subprime market, the difference was even greater -- 275 basis points more.

·                       A 2006 Center for Responsible Lending study that found when income and credit risk were equal, African-Americans were 31 percent to 34 percent more likely to receive higher-rate, more expensive subprime loans than Caucasians.

·                       A 2008 study by United for a Fair Economy finds cites federal data showing people of color are more than three times more likely to have subprime loans: high-cost loans account for 55% of loans to African Americans, but only 17% of loans to Caucasians.

The study also estimated losses of between $164 billion and $213 billion for subprime loans taken by people of color during the past eight years. This is thought to be "the greatest loss of wealth for people of color in modern US history."

·                       The National Community Reinvestment Coalition found in 2006 that lending institutions in six major metropolitan areas were engaged in "pervasive discriminatory and predatory practices" involving high-cost subprime loans to African-Americans.  The metro areas were: Baltimore , Washington , Chicago , Los Angeles , St. Louis and Atlanta .

In addition to finding discrimination nationwide, the study found that people of all income levels -- not just low or middle – were victimized. For example, the study found that in Boston , 73 percent of high income ($92,000 to $152,000 annual salary) African Americans received subprime loans in 2005.

·                       The Federal Reserve Board has concluded that African Americans were more likely to pay higher prices for mortgages than their Caucasian counterparts. The United States Inspector General cited the Federal Reserve Board report as showing "significant" differences, making it "clear" that African-Americans were "much more likely to get higher-priced loans" than Caucasians.

Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation's oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, conducting voter mobilization and monitoring equal opportunity in the public and private sectors.


Media Contact: Richard J. McIntire (410) 580-5787

Last Updated (Friday, 13 May 2011 14:41)